Download A Stakeholder Rationale for Risk Management: Implications by Gregor Gossy, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Paul Wentges PDF

By Gregor Gossy, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Paul Wentges

Regularly, purely the pursuits of shareholders, debtholders, and company administration are taken under consideration whilst studying company monetary judgements whereas the pursuits of non-financial stakeholders are frequently ignored. Gregor Gossy develops a so-called stakeholder motive for danger administration arguing that agencies that are extra depending on implicit claims from their non-financial stakeholders, equivalent to shoppers, providers, and staff, want conservative monetary rules. so as to practice panel information analyses of the determinants of company monetary judgements, the writer makes use of info from Austrian and German business businesses.

Show description

Read or Download A Stakeholder Rationale for Risk Management: Implications for Corporate Finance Decisions PDF

Best risk management books

Everything you want to know about Organisational Change

This publication considers such swap within the glossy context of IS/IT being either enablers (and occasionally inhibitors) of commercial switch. it's always thought of to be inextricably associated with enterprise - usually via IT pundits; the recognition of outsourcing IT and the expanding profile of software program as a carrier are facts issues that company would possibly not percentage that time of view.

The CME Group Risk Management Handbook: Products and Applications

Content material: bankruptcy 1 Futures industry basics (pages 1–42): John W. LabuszewskiChapter 2 Order access and Execution Methodologies (pages 43–79): Richard Co and John W. LabuszewskiChapter three function of the Clearinghouse (pages 80–100): Dale Michaels, Jim Moran and John W. LabuszewskiChapter four forex Futures: the 1st monetary Futures (pages 101–136): John W.

Loss Models: Further Topics

A necessary source for developing and studying complex actuarial models Loss types: extra themes offers prolonged assurance of modeling by utilizing instruments on the topic of chance concept, loss distributions, and survival versions. The ebook makes use of those ways to build and review actuarial versions within the fields of assurance and enterprise.

A History of British Actuarial Thought

Within the first publication of its kind,Turnbull strains the improvement and implementation of actuarial rules, from the belief of Equitable lifestyles within the mid-18th century to the beginning of the twenty first century. This ebook analyses the ancient improvement of British actuarial proposal in every one of its 3 major perform components of lifestyles insurance, pensions and basic assurance.

Additional info for A Stakeholder Rationale for Risk Management: Implications for Corporate Finance Decisions

Sample text

Therefore, firm-specific risks may not be omitted from a strategic management perspective. 34 Although controversially discussed between scholars from finance and strategy, Bettis' (1983) article lays the ground for further contributions from strategy researchers criticizing the CAPM's application in strategy research. , Amit and Wernerfelt (1990) and Chatterjee et al. (1999). Their main points of criticism are outlined below. Amit and Wernerfelt (1990) offer three motives for why managers might indeed engage in reducing business risk.

Examples of such socially complex resources are a firm's reputation among various stakeholders, a firm's culture, or the teamwork among employees (Barney, 1991: 107–111; Barney and Hesterly, 1996: 134). Originally developed to improve understanding about the strategy and (out) performance of the firm, recent pieces of literature show that the RBV is related to the financial policy of the firm. Particularly, resource-driven strategies shape the future financial decisions of the firm and can increase the cost of the firm's financial structure.

The difference between OC and OL is Net Organizational Capital, NOC, which is positive when the implicit claims are sold to the firm's stakeholders at an average price that exceeds the average cost of honoring them (Cornell and Shapiro, 1987: 8). Wentges (2000) argues that the value stakeholders ascribe to their implicit claims with the firm depends on the perceived risk profile of the firm (Wentges, 2000: 204). Stakeholders' risk premia for this perceived risk profile are driven by their individual preferences, their potential to diversify risks, the weight of their implicit claims in their overall portfolio, but primarily the financial and non-financial rewards they expect to receive from the firm in the future (Wentges, 2002: 148).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.86 of 5 – based on 44 votes